en-fr  Life first emerged in ‘warm little ponds’ almost as old as the Earth itself.
La vie est d'abord manifestée dans «petits étangs chauds» presque aussi anciens que la Terre elle-même.

La célèbre idée de Charles Darwin soutenue par une nouvelle étude scientifique.

Ian Johnston, Correspondant scientifique @montaukian, Independent, News, Science, lundi 2 octobre 2017.

La vie sur Terre a commencé il y a environ 4,5 milliards d'années alors que les météorites riches en carbone ont bombardé la planète et ont lessivé les éléments essentiels en «petits étangs chauds», selon de nouvelles recherches.

C'est dans ce bouillon riche en éléments nutritifs que les premières molécules auto-répliquées, avec le premier code génétique à vie, sont nées.

Bien que l'idée que nous découlons de quelque chose qui a émergé dans "petits étangs chaleureux" a été suggérée par Charles Darwin au 19ème siècle, elle a été contestée par des allégations tout a commencé autour des évents hydrothermiques dans l'océan.

Mais, dans un nouvel article dans le journal Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences (PNAS), les chercheurs ont décrit comment ils avaient construit un «modèle complet» prouvant que l'idée de Darwin était plausible.

On pense que le premier matériau génétique a été l'acide ribonucléique ou l'ARN, que chaque humain a avec l'ADN. Alors que l'ADN est comme le «plan directeur» d'une cellule, l'ARN est impliqué dans la traduction de ce code en protéines et comporte un certain nombre d'autres tâches dans la régulation des processus dans les cellules, y compris la croissance, le vieillissement et la mort.

Dans l'article PNAS, les scientifiques ont écrit: "L'une des questions les plus fondamentales dans la science est la façon dont la vie a d'abord émergé sur Terre.

« Compte tenu de son omniprésence dans les cellules vivantes et de sa capacité à stocker l'information génétique et à catalyser sa propre réplication, l'ARN est probablement la base de la première forme de vie. » Ils ont souligné la preuve fossile de la vie datée de plus de 3,7 milliards d'années.

Les chercheurs ont écrit : « Ainsi, le monde de l'ARN se serait développé sur une Terre primitive violente qui subissait un bombardement météoritique. »

« À cette époque, l'atmosphère était dominée par des gazs volcaniques et la terre sèche était rare, les continents émergeant de l'océan global. » Leur modèle suggére que les polymères primitifs d'ARN « seraient probablement apparus il y a plus de 4,17 milliards d'années » et peut-être même il y a 4,5 milliards d'années. La planète Terre elle-même semble être âgée d'environ 4,54 milliards d'années.

Si la vie est vraiment aussi ancienne que ça, cela sous-entend un certain nombre de choses.

L'une est que la simple vie est probablement assez commune dans l'univers pour pouvoir survivre dans des conditions hostiles. À cette époque, la Terre n'était pas protégée par une couche protectrice d'ozone pour filtrer les rayons ultraviolets nocifs du soleil en plus du bombardement de météores.

Mais cela peut ausi montrer que la vie intelligente prend beaucoup de temps pour se développer et par conséquent doit probablement être rare. L'Univers, avec environ 13,8 milliards d'années, est seulement trois fois plus âgé que la Terre.

The researchers drew on astrophysics, geology, chemistry, biology and other fields to develop their model of the creation of life.

One of the authors of the paper, Professor Ralph Pudritz, of McMaster University in Canada, said the evidence seemed to be pointing in one direction.

“Because there are so many inputs from so many different fields, it’s kind of amazing that it all hangs together,” he said.

"Each step led very naturally to the next. To have them all lead to a clear picture in the end is saying there’s something right about this.” “We’re thrilled that we can put together a theoretical paper that combines all these threads, makes clear predictions and offers clear ideas that we can take to the laboratory.” He said it seemed clear that RNA would have evolved before DNA.

“DNA is too complex to have been the first aspect of life to emerge,” Professor Pudritz said. “It had to start with something else, and that is RNA.” Ben Pearce, a graduate student at McMaster who co-wrote the paper, said this was the first time all the evidence had been put into a model.

"No one’s actually run the calculation before. This is a pretty big beginning. It’s pretty exciting,” he said.

It is thought the first molecules replicated themselves – the most basic definition of life – by folding over and drawing in similar material from the environment.

This simple process began the process of evolution as molecules that were better suited to their environment became more numerous and those that were not ‘died’ out.

Understanding this process, Mr Pearce said, was “the Holy Grail of experimental origins-of-life chemistry”.
unit 1
Life first emerged in ‘warm little ponds’ almost as old as the Earth itself.
1 Translations, 1 Upvotes, Last Activity 1 year, 1 month ago
unit 2
Charles Darwin's famous idea backed by new scientific study.
1 Translations, 1 Upvotes, Last Activity 1 year, 1 month ago
unit 3
unit 14
Planet Earth itself is thought to be about 4.54 billion years old.
1 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity 11 months, 2 weeks ago
unit 15
If life is truly as old as this, it suggests a number of things.
1 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity 11 months, 2 weeks ago
unit 16
unit 19
The universe, at about 13.8 billion years, is only three times older than Earth.
1 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity 11 months, 2 weeks ago
unit 23
"Each step led very naturally to the next.
0 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity None
unit 27
"No one’s actually run the calculation before.
0 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity None
unit 28
This is a pretty big beginning.
0 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity None
unit 29
It’s pretty exciting,” he said.
0 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity None

Life first emerged in ‘warm little ponds’ almost as old as the Earth itself.

Charles Darwin's famous idea backed by new scientific study.

Ian Johnston, Science Correspondent @montaukian, Independent, News, Science, Monday 2 October 2017.

Life on Earth began up to 4.5 billion years ago as carbon-rich meteors bombarded the planet and leached the essential elements into “warm little ponds”, according to new research.

It was in this nutrient-rich broth that the first self-replicating molecules, with the first genetic code for life, were born.

While the idea we are descended from something that emerged in “warm little ponds” was suggested by Charles Darwin in the 19th century, it has been challenged by claims it all started around hydrothermal vents in the ocean.

But, in a new paper in the journal Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences (PNAS), researchers described how they had constructed a “comprehensive model” proving Darwin’s idea was plausible.

The earliest genetic material is believed to have been ribonucleic acid or RNA, which every human has along with DNA. While DNA is like the “blueprint” of a cell, the RNA is involved in translating this code into proteins and has a number of other tasks in regulating processes in cells, including growth, ageing and death.

In the PNAS paper, the scientists wrote: “One of the most fundamental questions in science is how life first emerged on Earth.

“Given its ubiquity in living cells and its ability to both store genetic information and catalyse its own replication, RNA probably formed the basis of first life.”

They pointed to fossil evidence of life dated to more than 3.7 billion years ago.

“Thus the RNA world would have developed on a violent early Earth undergoing meteoritic bombardment,” the researchers wrote.

“At that time, the atmosphere was dominated by volcanic gases, and dry land was scarce as continents were rising out of the global ocean.”

Their model suggested the first RNA polymers “likely appeared before 4.17 billion years ago” and possibly as long ago as 4.5 billion years. Planet Earth itself is thought to be about 4.54 billion years old.

If life is truly as old as this, it suggests a number of things.

One is that simple life is likely to be common in the universe as it can survive in hostile conditions. At the time, the Earth was not shielded by a protective layer of ozone to filter out harmful ultraviolet rays from the Sun in addition to meteor bombardment.

But it also could be a sign that intelligent life takes a long time to develop and is therefore likely to be rare. The universe, at about 13.8 billion years, is only three times older than Earth.

The researchers drew on astrophysics, geology, chemistry, biology and other fields to develop their model of the creation of life.

One of the authors of the paper, Professor Ralph Pudritz, of McMaster University in Canada, said the evidence seemed to be pointing in one direction.

“Because there are so many inputs from so many different fields, it’s kind of amazing that it all hangs together,” he said.

"Each step led very naturally to the next. To have them all lead to a clear picture in the end is saying there’s something right about this.”

“We’re thrilled that we can put together a theoretical paper that combines all these threads, makes clear predictions and offers clear ideas that we can take to the laboratory.”

He said it seemed clear that RNA would have evolved before DNA.

“DNA is too complex to have been the first aspect of life to emerge,” Professor Pudritz said. “It had to start with something else, and that is RNA.”

Ben Pearce, a graduate student at McMaster who co-wrote the paper, said this was the first time all the evidence had been put into a model.

"No one’s actually run the calculation before. This is a pretty big beginning. It’s pretty exciting,” he said.

It is thought the first molecules replicated themselves – the most basic definition of life – by folding over and drawing in similar material from the environment.

This simple process began the process of evolution as molecules that were better suited to their environment became more numerous and those that were not ‘died’ out.

Understanding this process, Mr Pearce said, was “the Holy Grail of experimental origins-of-life chemistry”.