en-es  Dalai Lama Arunachal visit: China accuses India of ‘fuelling tensions’
Dalai Lama Arunachal visit: China accuses India of ‘fuelling tensions’ The protest was lodged in Beijing with Indian Ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale.
Indian Express, Beijing | April 6, 2017 4:19 pm China said on Thursday that it has lodged protests with India both in Beijing and New Delhi over the Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh and accused it of “fuelling tensions” by allowing the Tibetan spiritual leader in the “disputed areas”. “I can confirm (that) China has lodged protest in Beijing and Delhi,” on Wednesday, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying told a media briefing. The protest was lodged in Beijing with Indian Ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale. In Delhi, the protest was lodged with the competent officials of the External Affairs Ministry, Hua said.
Asked whether Beijing views India’s permission to the 81-year-old Dalai Lama to visit Arunachal Pradesh as amounting to questioning the ‘One China’ policy, Hua said, “I want to re-emphasise that on issues concerning China’s major concern and core interests, territorial and sovereignty, China’s position is consistent.” “By inviting and approving (the) Dalai Lama to (visit) disputed areas between China and India, India has damaged our interests and the India-China relationship and it has fuelled tensions,” she said. “We oppose the visit to relevant areas and oppose attempts by relevant countries to arrange a platform for (the) Dalai (Lama) to conduct anti-China activities. We urge relevant country to stop such erroneous actions and stop undermining Chinese interests,” she said.
Asked about assertions in the Chinese media that India’s move was aimed at pressuring Beijing over the issues relating to China blocking India’s Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) membership bid, Hua said, “China will not make any assumptions on India’s intentions.” She said the Dalai Lama’s visit has caused damage to India-China relations. “We hope the two sides can continue to follow principle of mutual respect for each other’s core interests and major concerns and we should do more things that can strengthen mutual political trust and promote the overall interests of China-India relations,” she said.
On India’s NSG bid, Hua said this issue should be resolved by all the 48 members of the group. “We should achieve a solution that applies indiscriminately to all non-Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty countries through consultation and discussion,” she said.
Meanwhile, the official media in Beijing said that China should not hesitate to answer “blows with blows” if India chooses to play dirty by allowing the Dalai Lama to visit Arunachal Pradesh. Two English newspapers — China Daily and Global Times – launched a scathing attack on India after Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren Rijiju said that Arunachal Pradesh –which China claims as part of Southern Tibet — is “an inseparable part of India”.
Taking exception to Rijiju’s remarks, the papers said India is using the Dalai Lama as a “diplomatic tool” against China for its “vice like veto” against India’s membership in the NSG and the UN ban on Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar. “New Delhi not only allowed the 14th Dalai Lama to visit Southern Tibet, a historical Chinese territory India has illicitly occupied and refers to as ‘Arunachal Pradesh’, but the spiritual leader of ‘Tibetan independence’ was also escorted on the trip by India’s junior minister of home affairs,” the state-run China Daily said in its editorial.
“To Beijing, that is a double affront,” it said. “Rijiju might think himself cute in borrowing a line from Beijing’s diplomatic representations, but he has ignored the fundamental distinction here: Like Taiwan and any other part of China, Tibet is a part of the Chinese territory no matter whether New Delhi agrees or not,” it said in the editorial.
“Southern Tibet, on the other hand, was stolen from China by his country’s former colonial master taking advantage of China’s internal strife. Should he have any questions regarding the status of Southern Tibet, Rijiju can consult the historical archives,” it said.
“Neither the ‘McMahon Line’, by which New Delhi justifies its actual control of Southern Tibet nor the present-day ‘Arunachal Pradesh’ has Beijing’s endorsement. In other words, Indian occupation of the area is legally untenable. Using it as leverage, therefore, is not just unethical, it is outright illicit,” the editorial said.
Despite the historical dispute, the China-India border area has by and large remained peaceful recently, particularly since Beijing and New Delhi began to get serious about border talks, it said. “If New Delhi chooses to play dirty, however, Beijing should not hesitate to answer blows with blows,” the paper said.
The aggressive editorials came after China yesterday lodged a protest over the Tibetan spiritual leader’s visit to the area. The Dalai Lama is currently on a nine-day visit to Arunachal Pradesh. In its editorial, the ruling CPC-run Global Times criticised Rijiju for accompanying the Dalai Lama during his visit to the state.
“The Dalai Lama has been to the disputed region before, but what makes this trip different is that he is received and accompanied by India’s Junior Home Minister Kiren Rijiju. When China raised the concern over the visit, Rijiju commented that China shouldn’t intervene in their ‘internal affairs’,” it said.
“New Delhi probably overestimates its leverage in the bilateral ties with China. The two countries in recent years have continuously strived to improve their relationship and the peace on the border area has been maintained,” it said.
“India has benefited from the good momentum of bilateral relationship as much as China. If New Delhi ruins the Sino-India ties and the two countries turn into open rivals, can India afford the consequence?,” the tabloid, known for striking aggressive nationalistic postures, said.
unit 17
“To Beijing, that is a double affront,” it said.
0 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity None
unit 22
In other words, Indian occupation of the area is legally untenable.
0 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity None
unit 27
The Dalai Lama is currently on a nine-day visit to Arunachal Pradesh.
0 Translations, 0 Upvotes, Last Activity None

Dalai Lama Arunachal visit: China accuses India of ‘fuelling tensions’
The protest was lodged in Beijing with Indian Ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale.
Indian Express, Beijing | April 6, 2017 4:19 pm
China said on Thursday that it has lodged protests with India both in Beijing and New
Delhi over the Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh and accused it of “fuelling
tensions” by allowing the Tibetan spiritual leader in the “disputed areas”. “I can confirm
(that) China has lodged protest in Beijing and Delhi,” on Wednesday, Chinese Foreign
Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying told a media briefing. The protest was lodged in
Beijing with Indian Ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale. In Delhi, the protest was lodged
with the competent officials of the External Affairs Ministry, Hua said.
Asked whether Beijing views India’s permission to the 81-year-old Dalai Lama to visit
Arunachal Pradesh as amounting to questioning the ‘One China’ policy, Hua said, “I
want to re-emphasise that on issues concerning China’s major concern and core
interests, territorial and sovereignty, China’s position is consistent.”
“By inviting and approving (the) Dalai Lama to (visit) disputed areas between China and
India, India has damaged our interests and the India-China relationship and it has
fuelled tensions,” she said. “We oppose the visit to relevant areas and oppose attempts
by relevant countries to arrange a platform for (the) Dalai (Lama) to conduct anti-China
activities. We urge relevant country to stop such erroneous actions and stop
undermining Chinese interests,” she said.
Asked about assertions in the Chinese media that India’s move was aimed at
pressuring Beijing over the issues relating to China blocking India’s Nuclear Suppliers
Group (NSG) membership bid, Hua said, “China will not make any assumptions on
India’s intentions.”
She said the Dalai Lama’s visit has caused damage to India-China relations. “We hope
the two sides can continue to follow principle of mutual respect for each other’s core
interests and major concerns and we should do more things that can strengthen mutual
political trust and promote the overall interests of China-India relations,” she said.
On India’s NSG bid, Hua said this issue should be resolved by all the 48 members of
the group. “We should achieve a solution that applies indiscriminately to all non-Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty countries through consultation and discussion,” she said.
Meanwhile, the official media in Beijing said that China should not hesitate to answer
“blows with blows” if India chooses to play dirty by allowing the Dalai Lama to visit
Arunachal Pradesh. Two English newspapers — China Daily and Global Times –
launched a scathing attack on India after Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren Rijiju
said that Arunachal Pradesh –which China claims as part of Southern Tibet — is “an
inseparable part of India”.
Taking exception to Rijiju’s remarks, the papers said India is using the Dalai Lama as a
“diplomatic tool” against China for its “vice like veto” against India’s membership in the
NSG and the UN ban on Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar. “New Delhi not only
allowed the 14th Dalai Lama to visit Southern Tibet, a historical Chinese territory India
has illicitly occupied and refers to as ‘Arunachal Pradesh’, but the spiritual leader of
‘Tibetan independence’ was also escorted on the trip by India’s junior minister of home
affairs,” the state-run China Daily said in its editorial.
“To Beijing, that is a double affront,” it said. “Rijiju might think himself cute in borrowing
a line from Beijing’s diplomatic representations, but he has ignored the fundamental
distinction here: Like Taiwan and any other part of China, Tibet is a part of the Chinese
territory no matter whether New Delhi agrees or not,” it said in the editorial.
“Southern Tibet, on the other hand, was stolen from China by his country’s former
colonial master taking advantage of China’s internal strife. Should he have any
questions regarding the status of Southern Tibet, Rijiju can consult the historical
archives,” it said.
“Neither the ‘McMahon Line’, by which New Delhi justifies its actual control of Southern
Tibet nor the present-day ‘Arunachal Pradesh’ has Beijing’s endorsement. In other
words, Indian occupation of the area is legally untenable. Using it as leverage,
therefore, is not just unethical, it is outright illicit,” the editorial said.
Despite the historical dispute, the China-India border area has by and large remained
peaceful recently, particularly since Beijing and New Delhi began to get serious about
border talks, it said. “If New Delhi chooses to play dirty, however, Beijing should not
hesitate to answer blows with blows,” the paper said.
The aggressive editorials came after China yesterday lodged a protest over the Tibetan
spiritual leader’s visit to the area. The Dalai Lama is currently on a nine-day visit to
Arunachal Pradesh. In its editorial, the ruling CPC-run Global Times criticised Rijiju for
accompanying the Dalai Lama during his visit to the state.
“The Dalai Lama has been to the disputed region before, but what makes this trip
different is that he is received and accompanied by India’s Junior Home Minister Kiren
Rijiju. When China raised the concern over the visit, Rijiju commented that China
shouldn’t intervene in their ‘internal affairs’,” it said.
“New Delhi probably overestimates its leverage in the bilateral ties with China. The two
countries in recent years have continuously strived to improve their relationship and the
peace on the border area has been maintained,” it said.
“India has benefited from the good momentum of bilateral relationship as much as
China. If New Delhi ruins the Sino-India ties and the two countries turn into open rivals,
can India afford the consequence?,” the tabloid, known for striking aggressive
nationalistic postures, said.